Es el segundo año que Business Week construye este indicador
(entretenimiento, educación, economía, delitos,calidad del aire). La única
ciudad de Florida es TAMPA que por mucho tiempo ha trabajado para ser lo que
es. Varias cosas que
pensar/ Business Week has done it
for second time, based on leisure, education, economy, crime, air quality. The
only one city from Florida is TAMPA, with a long time effort to enhance itself.
Several things to think about:
1.- No siempre coinciden los números con las aspiraciones.
(Imaginense diciendole a la familia: nos mudamos para Anchorage, Alaska para
vivir mejor…) Ese es un viejo problema (los matemáticos que descubren las
mejores dietas por costo/persona saben hace rato que no hay quien se las coma…)/
Human aspirations and numbers not
always go in par (Just wonder how to tell your family they are moving to
Anchorage, for a better living…) It is an old problem (mathematicians discover
best diets based on cost/person but there is no way that people eat them…
2.- Nuestros líderes civicos debian de pensar sobre
el tema para descubrir la receta adecuada para que nuestras ciudades se
consideren cunas del progreso y mecas de vida humana…/Our civic leaders must think about this,to
discover the right recipe to turn our cities in progress cradles and human
living meccas…
The
Best Places to Live
It's impossible to
say what's "best" for everyone, of course. But
where's the fun in not trying? Welcome to Businessweek.com’s second America’s
Best Cities ranking. With assistance from Bloomberg Rankings, Businessweek.com
evaluated 100 of the country’s largest cities based on leisure attributes (the
number of restaurants, bars, libraries, museums, professional sports teams, and
park acres by population); educational attributes (public school performance,
the number of colleges, and graduate degree holders), economic factors (2011
income and June and July 2012 unemployment), crime, and air quality. Major
professional league and minor league teams, as well as U.S.-based teams
belonging to international leagues in that city were included. The greatest
weighting was placed on leisure amenities, followed by educational metrics and
economic metrics, and then crime and air quality. The data come from Onboard Informatics,
except for park acreage, which comes from the Trust for Public Land. As
the methodology has changed since the 2011 ranking, a city’s rise or fall
compared with last year does not suggest that it has gotten “better” or
“worse.”
|
1.- San Francisco
|
11.- Pittsburgh
|
21.- Cincinnati
|
31.- Oalkland
|
41.- Dallas
|
|
2.- Seattle
|
12.- Minneapolis
|
22.- Houston
|
32.- Rochester
|
42.- Reno
|
|
3.- Washington DC
|
13.- Nashville
|
23.- Oklahoma ity
|
33.- San Jose
|
43.- Scottsdale
|
|
4.- Boston
|
14.- New Orleans
|
24.- Philadelphia
|
34.- Lincoln
|
44.- Phoenix
|
|
5.- Portland, Oregon
|
15.- Kansas City
|
25.- Lexington
|
35.- Tampa
|
45.- Chesapeake
|
|
6.- Denver
|
16.- Atlanta
|
26.- Milwakee
|
36.- Colorado Springs
|
46.- Cleveland
|
|
7.- New York
|
17.- Madison
|
27.- Arlington
|
37.- Indianapolis
|
47.- St. Louis
|
|
8.- Austin
|
18.- Raleigh
|
28.- Chicago
|
38.- Tulsa
|
48.- Omaha
|
|
9.- San Diego
|
19.- Honolulu
|
29.- Baltimore
|
39.- Charlotte
|
49.- Anchorage
|
|
10.- St Paul
|
20.- Colombus
|
30.- San Antonio
|
40.- Virginia Beach
|
50.- Los Angeles
|
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario