It's a long story. How math and statistics do not have a proper link with taste and personal preferences. Researchers have done a lot of work making "the perfect diet" with balanced elements, minimum costs and convenience to store. But no one ever liked it. Taste and preferences are unique, coming from the deeper feelings, habits, culture and many other unmeasurable factors, But data is always important because is the only thing we use without controversy... So we bring to you this exercise from Bloomberg BusinessWeek. This is the second time we bring it to our followers, as a tool to compare with our cities...
Omaha
St. Louis
Cleveland
Chesapeake, Virginia
Phoenix
Scottsdale, Arizona
Reno, Nevada
Dallas
Virginia Beach
Charlotte
Tulsa
Indianapolis
Colorado Springs
Tampa
Lincoln, Nebraska
San Jose
Rochester, New York
Oakland, California
San Antonio
Baltimore
Chicago
Arlington, Virginia
Milwaukee
Lexington, Kentucky
Philadelphia
Oklahoma City
Houston
Cincinnati
Columbus, Ohio
Honolulu
Raleigh, North Carolina
Madison
Atlanta
Kansas City, Missouri
New Orleans
Nashville
Minneapolis
Pittsburgh
St. Paul, Minnesota
San Diego, California
Austin
New York
Denver
Portland, Oregon
Boston
Washington, D.C.
Seattle
San Francisco
The
Best Places to Live
It's
impossible to say what's "best" for everyone, of course. But where's
the fun in not trying? Welcome to Businessweek.com’s second America’s Best
Cities ranking. With assistance from Bloomberg Rankings, Businessweek.com
evaluated 100 of the country’s largest cities based on leisure attributes (the
number of restaurants, bars, libraries, museums, professional sports teams, and
park acres by population); educational attributes (public school performance,
the number of colleges, and graduate degree holders), economic factors (2011
income and June and July 2012 unemployment), crime, and air quality. Major
professional league and minor league teams, as well as U.S.-based teams
belonging to international leagues in that city were included. The greatest
weighting was placed on leisure amenities, followed by educational metrics and
economic metrics, and then crime and air quality.
The data come from Onboard Informatics, except for park acreage, which comes from the Trust for Public
Land. As the methodology has changed since
the 2011 ranking, a city’s rise or fall compared with last year does not
suggest that it has gotten “better” or “worse.”
Los
Angeles
Rank: 50
Population: 3,811,518
Population: 3,811,518
Anchorage,
Alaska
Rank: 49
Population: 297,018
Population: 297,018
Omaha
Rank: 48
Population: 416,855
Population: 416,855
St. Louis
Rank: 47
Population: 304,219
Population: 304,219
Cleveland
Rank: 46
Population: 396,441
Population: 396,441
Chesapeake, Virginia
Rank: 45
Population: 223,454
Population: 223,454
Phoenix
Rank: 44
Population: 1,418,687
Population: 1,418,687
Scottsdale, Arizona
Rank: 43
Population: 214,770
Population: 214,770
Reno, Nevada
Rank: 42
Population: 225,561
Population: 225,561
Dallas
Rank: 41
Population: 1,199,739
Population: 1,199,739
Virginia Beach
Rank: 40
Population: 438,243
Population: 438,243
Charlotte
Rank: 39
Population: 745,596
Population: 745,596
Tulsa
Rank: 38
Population: 395,176
Population: 395,176
Indianapolis
Rank: 37
Population: 831,943
Population: 831,943
Colorado Springs
Rank: 36
Population: 421,350
Population: 421,350
Tampa
Rank: 34 (tie)
Population: 340,509
Population: 340,509
Lincoln, Nebraska
Rank: 34 (tie)
Population: 259,06
Population: 259,06
San Jose
Rank: 33
Population: 956,368
Population: 956,368
Rochester, New York
Rank: 32
Population: 213,178
Population: 213,178
Oakland, California
Rank: 31
Population: 401,036
Population: 401,036
San Antonio
Rank: 30
Population: 1,365,256
Population: 1,365,256
Baltimore
Rank: 29
Population: 612,701
Population: 612,701
Chicago
Rank: 28
Population: 2,679,998
Population: 2,679,998
Arlington, Virginia
Rank: 27
Population: 208,143
Population: 208,143
Milwaukee
Rank: 26
Population: 593,545
Population: 593,545
Lexington, Kentucky
Rank: 25
Population: 299,520
Population: 299,520
Philadelphia
Rank: 24
Population: 1,522,648
Population: 1,522,648
Oklahoma City
Rank: 23
Population: 588,053
Population: 588,053
Houston
Rank: 22
Population: 2,131,940
Population: 2,131,940
Cincinnati
Rank: 21
Population: 292,050
Population: 292,050
Columbus, Ohio
Rank: 20
Population: 796,520
Population: 796,520
Honolulu
Rank: 19
Population: 399,124
Population: 399,124
Raleigh, North Carolina
Rank: 18
Population: 405,462
Population: 405,462
Madison
Rank: 17
Population: 231,999
Population: 231,999
Atlanta
Rank: 16
Population: 410,60
Population: 410,60
Kansas City, Missouri
Rank: 15
Population: 458,064
Population: 458,064
New Orleans
Rank: 14
Population: 349,773
Population: 349,773
Nashville
Rank: 13
Population: 603,394
Population: 603,394
Minneapolis
Rank: 12
Population: 388,229
Population: 388,229
Pittsburgh
Rank: 11
Population: 308,090
Population: 308,090
St. Paul, Minnesota
Rank: 10
Population: 288,263
Population: 288,263
San Diego, California
Rank: 9
Population: 1,319,558
Population: 1,319,558
Austin
Rank: 8
Population: 797,215
Population: 797,215
New York
Rank: 7
Population: 8,110,206
Population: 8,110,206
Denver
Rank: 6
Population: 597,466
Population: 597,466
Portland, Oregon
Rank: 5
Population: 598,205
Population: 598,205
Boston
Rank: 4
Population: 615,462
Population: 615,462
Washington, D.C.
Rank: 3
Population: 607,731
Population: 607,731
Seattle
Rank: 2
Population: 624,070
Population: 624,070
San Francisco
Rank: 1
Population: 808,854
Population: 808,854
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario